Homepage Get Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF
Article Map

The DA 2166-9-1 form serves as a crucial tool in evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. This evaluation report is designed specifically for Sergeants and plays a vital role in documenting their professional development and overall effectiveness. The form captures essential administrative data, including the NCO's name, rank, and unit information, ensuring accurate identification and context for the evaluation. It also requires input from both the rater and senior rater, who provide assessments of the NCO's performance across various attributes, such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. These evaluations are not merely subjective; they are grounded in specific criteria and expectations outlined in Army regulations. Furthermore, the form includes sections for counseling dates and signatures, reinforcing accountability and transparency in the evaluation process. The DA 2166-9-1 is not just a bureaucratic requirement; it is a comprehensive assessment that helps shape the future of NCOs and, by extension, the Army itself.

Dos and Don'ts

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process if you keep a few key points in mind. Here’s a helpful list of dos and don’ts to guide you through it.

  • Do ensure that all names are spelled correctly, including the rated NCO, rater, and senior rater.
  • Do use the correct format for dates, following the YYYYMMDD structure.
  • Do double-check that the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number is accurate.
  • Do provide complete and detailed descriptions in the duty description section.
  • Do include all necessary email addresses, ensuring they end with .gov or .mil.
  • Don't leave any fields blank unless specifically instructed to do so.
  • Don't use informal language or abbreviations that might confuse the reader.
  • Don't forget to sign and date the form where required.
  • Don't submit the form without reviewing it for errors or omissions.
  • Don't overlook the importance of the counseling dates; they must be accurate and reflect the correct timeline.

By following these guidelines, you can help ensure that your evaluation report is completed correctly and efficiently. Taking the time to fill out the form with care will reflect positively on you and your professionalism.

Document Attributes

Fact Name Details
Form Title NCO Evaluation Report (SGT)
Governing Regulations AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3
Proponent Agency DCS, G-1
Privacy Act Statement See AR 623-3 for details
Part I Focus Administrative data including name, SSN, rank, and unit information
Part II Authentication Includes signatures and details of the rater and senior rater
Performance Evaluation Assesses attributes such as character, presence, intellect, and leadership
Submission Requirements Includes counseling dates and acknowledgment of the appeals process

Key takeaways

Filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form requires attention to detail and understanding of its structure. Here are key takeaways to keep in mind:

  • Accurate Information: Ensure that all personal details, such as name, SSN, and rank, are correct in Part I. Mistakes can lead to delays or complications.
  • Clear Duty Descriptions: In Part III, provide a thorough description of daily duties and special emphasis areas. This helps assess performance accurately.
  • Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, focus on specific attributes such as character, presence, and intellect. Use bullet comments to clearly articulate performance levels.
  • Rater and Senior Rater Signatures: Both raters must sign and date the form in Part II. Their signatures confirm the evaluation process was followed.
  • Rater’s Overall Performance: The rater must assess the NCO’s overall performance in Part IV. This section is crucial for determining future potential.
  • Senior Rater’s Assessment: The senior rater evaluates the NCO’s potential in Part V. This includes selecting the appropriate qualification level and listing future assignments.
  • Awareness of Appeals Process: The rated NCO should understand their rights regarding the appeals process as outlined in AR 623-3. This knowledge is vital for transparency and fairness.

Example - Da 2166 9 1 Form

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-­3 and DA PAM 623-­3 the proponent agency is DCS, G-­1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-­3

PART I ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY

c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER

c3. RANK

PMOSC/

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

REVIEW REQUIRED?

(Last, First, Middle Initial)

 

 

BRANCH

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c4. COMMENTS

 

c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE

c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)

 

c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS

ENCLOSED?

 

 

 

 

 

 

(.gov or .mil)

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-­3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

LATER

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

SSN (or DOD ID No.)

THRU DATE

 

 

 

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional

COMMENTS:

bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

 

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:

Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:

influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by

example Communicates.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:

workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,

Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the

profession.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)

COMMENTS:

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE

 

i. I currently rate

NCOs in this grade.

 

COMMENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART V SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL

a. Select one box representing Rated

b. COMMENTS:

 

NCO’s potential compared to others in the

 

 

same grade whom you have rated in your

 

 

career. I currently senior rate

 

 

NCOs in this grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOST QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED

 

 

QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-­5 years).

 

Successive Assignment:

1)

 

 

2)

Broadening Assignment:

 

 

 

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

 

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APD PE v1.00ES

Detailed Instructions for Writing Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is a straightforward process that requires attention to detail. This form is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Make sure to have all necessary information ready before starting, as this will streamline the process and ensure accuracy.

  1. Part I - Administrative Data:
    • Fill in the rated NCO's name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Enter the Social Security Number (SSN) or Department of Defense ID Number.
    • Indicate the NCO's rank.
    • Provide the date of rank.
    • List the Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code (PMOSC).
    • Input the unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
    • Specify the status code.
    • Enter the Unit Identification Code (UIC).
    • State the reason for submission.
    • Indicate the period covered (from and through dates).
    • List the rated months.
    • Include any non-rated codes.
    • State the number of enclosures.
    • Provide the rated NCO's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
  2. Part II - Authentication:
    • Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
    • Have the rater sign and date the form.
    • Fill in the rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
    • Include the rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
    • Enter the name of the senior rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the senior rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
    • Have the senior rater sign and date the form.
    • Fill in the senior rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
    • Include the senior rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
    • If applicable, fill out supplementary review information.
  3. Part III - Duty Description:
    • Enter the principal duty title.
    • Provide the duty MOSC.
    • Detail daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and budget.
    • List areas of special emphasis.
    • Include any appointed duties.
  4. Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
    • Fill in APFT results (pass/fail/profile) and date.
    • Record height and weight, and indicate if within standard.
    • Evaluate character and provide comments.
    • Assess presence and provide comments.
    • Evaluate intellect and provide comments.
    • Assess leadership and provide comments.
    • Evaluate development and provide comments.
    • Assess achievement and provide comments.
    • Provide overall performance rating from the rater.
  5. Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
    • Select the appropriate box for rated NCO’s potential.
    • Provide comments on the rated NCO's potential.
    • List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

After filling out the form, review all entries for accuracy. Make sure that all signatures are obtained where required. Once completed, submit the form according to your organization's procedures. This ensures that the evaluation is processed correctly and in a timely manner.

Documents used along the form

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it is often accompanied by several other forms and documents that help provide a comprehensive assessment of an NCO's performance and potential. Understanding these related documents can enhance the evaluation process and ensure that all necessary information is accurately captured.

  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for evaluating NCOs in higher grades. It provides a similar structure to the 2166-9-1 but is tailored for those in more senior positions. This helps maintain consistency in evaluations across different ranks.
  • DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is utilized to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. This form is essential for tracking an NCO's progress and areas for improvement, which can be referenced during the evaluation process.
  • DA Form 1059: This form is the Academic Evaluation Report. It is used to evaluate an NCO's performance in military schools and training courses. The insights from this report can provide valuable context regarding an NCO’s qualifications and readiness for advancement.
  • DA Form 750: The Army’s Personnel Evaluation Form is used to assess an individual's performance and potential. This form can be referenced during the evaluation process to ensure a well-rounded view of an NCO’s capabilities.
  • DA Form 2-1: The Personnel Qualification Record is a comprehensive document that contains a soldier's career history, qualifications, and training. It serves as a vital reference for evaluators to understand the full scope of an NCO's experience and skills.
  • Texas Notice to Quit: This form is essential for landlords looking to terminate a rental agreement, providing tenants with a timeframe to vacate the premises. For more information, you can refer to Texas Forms Online.
  • AR 623-3: This Army Regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the evaluation of NCOs. Familiarity with this regulation helps ensure that all evaluations are conducted in compliance with Army standards, fostering fairness and transparency.

By familiarizing oneself with these forms and documents, leaders can enhance their understanding of the evaluation process. This not only aids in making informed decisions but also supports the development and growth of NCOs within the Army. A thorough evaluation process ultimately contributes to a more effective and cohesive military force.